(SO!) BAD perceptual emphasis on Ubuntu ...

[Tony Godshall]

Nasty

My own humble opinion is that debian-derived
distros are welcome to participate in BAD
and that there's no need to exclude or rename

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> wrote:
> Quoting GoOSSBears (acohen36 at linuxwaves.com):
>
>> Mini-Soapbox (or a response to such)
>
> My assessment, yours for a small fee and waiver of reverse-engineering
> rights:  You're really being a bit of a shitkicker, here.  Suggest you
> quit while you're behind.
>
> I remember a guy who had a long campaign to get BayLISA (Bay Area Large
> Installation System Administrators) to rename themselves to something
> like Bay Area Large and Small System Administrators because members were
> permitted even if they didn't administer large sites.  At the time, I
> advised him to look up the word 'synecdoche'.
>
> --
> bad mailing list
> bad at bad.debian.net
> http://bad.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bad



-- 
Best Regards.
This is unedited.