Seeking good web sites for Debian tools
Claude Rubinson
rubinson@u.arizona.edu
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 21:05:01 -0700
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 08:30:31PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> David> Politics and election systems are interesting too, but I think
> David> there you have to concentrate first on an election system (like
> David> Australia's IRV, or Debian's Condorcet) if you want to change
> David> things, rather than considering "choice fatigue", which most
> David> likely won't play a factor any time soon. The centralized system
> David> we have is due to the rules of the game.
>
> I've been spotted at Green meetings so I had opportunity to think
> about this. I think you have it at least partly backwards. The
> rules are what they are because the two majors made them such, after
> they got a big scare from the Populists around last century turn.
> That's when "fusion" (ie. official ballot cross-endorsement) was
> made illegal in most states. New York is the exception and that is
> precisely why that state's politics is still relatively lively.
If I recall correctly, fusion was a response to our winner-take-all
election system. If we had a proportionally representative system,
tactics such as fusion wouldn't be necessary. Lacking such a system,
though, I suspect that fusion is probably among our best strategies
for third-party viability.
Claude