Debian Enterprise (not a Starfleet metaphor)

[Scott Dier]

* Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com> [031217 01:22]:
> compared to the Red Hat alternative).  Server upgrades can be painful,
> so having a slower release cycle isn't so much of a drawback.  Debian
> provides the stable base, and I put my custom stuff on top of it.

Upgrading 300+ desktops to a whole new 'major' distribution release
sucks too.

Woody with frequent backports has been the best I've worked with so far.

-- 
Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org> KC0OBS http://www.ringworld.org/
Free USA from energy dependence, http://www.apolloalliance.org/