Trackin' stable vs. releases
Nick Moffitt
nick@zork.net
Fri, 10 May 2002 00:57:46 -0700
begin Alan DuBoff quotation:
> On Thursday 09 May 2002 11:29 pm, Rick Moen wrote:
> > Actually, the best method of implementing your expressed
> > preference is the one Nick outlined.
>
> Why, so my apt-get update takes a friggin' year and a half to
> complete?<gd&r>
But your update will more often than not notice that "stable"
*hasn't changed*, so the time taken will be swamped by the *actual*
download time from testing.
HTTP does resumes, you know. If things haven't changed, you
won't download it. If they have, you want it!
--
INFORMATION GLADLY GIVEN BUT SAFETY REQUIRES AVOIDING UNNECESSARY CONVERSATION
end
01234567 <- The amazing* indent-o-meter!
^ (*: Indent-o-meter may not actually amaze.)