Intent to Party like its 1999

[David Bristel]

While I am also in San Jose, I'd say that we may want to have two parties, one
down here in San Jose for those staying down this way, and for those who live
or are staying further north to have a party up there.  Just a thought...


							Dave


On Sat, 27 Feb 1999, Chris Waters wrote:

> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 11:41:49 -0800
> From: Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net>
> To: Kevin Dalley <kevind@rahul.net>
> Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org,
>     Bay Area Debian <bad@kitenet.net>
> Subject: Re: Intent to Party like its 1999
> 
> Disclaimer: I live in San Jose.  :-)
> 
> But still, if this is supposed to be a post-Linuxworld gettogether,
> wouldn't it make the most sense to have it *near* Linuxworld? 
> Convenient for people visiting the area for Linuxworld and staying in
> nearby {h,m}otels, convenient for people attending Linuxworld from
> around the bay.  Inconvenient only for those who aren't going to
> Linuxworld and aren't nearby.
> 
> If this *isn't* really supposed to be a post-Linuxworld gettogether (I'm
> a little confused, since I think this thread started with a mention of
> the *IRC* party), then maybe Oakland or SF would be reasonable.  But in
> that case, I'd like to propose that we have one or more post-Linuxworld
> gettogethers near Linuxworld.  The south bay has plenty of nice spots. 
> Do we want coffee, bheer, or bhoth?
> 
> Traffic is another issue, and one that would tend to suggest that we not
> go too far from the convention center till later, i.e. *after* the
> gettogether when we're heading toward home (or temporary equivalent). 
> Bay area traffic is extremely bad, if not world-class bad quite yet
> -- 
> Chris Waters   xtifr@dsp.net | I have a truly elegant proof of the
>       or    xtifr@debian.org | above, but it is too long to fit into
> http://www.dsp.net/xtifr     | this .signature file.
>